wetzoeker

7.3 — Research Proposal Call for research proposals on assumptions underlying Dialogue & Dissent

Research Proposal

Summary and key words of research proposal

Provide a summary of your project proposal, written for the interested layman. The summary should describe briefly, in no more than 200 words, the main research objectives of your project, its research focus, and its relation to the underlying assumptions of the Theory of Change of the MFA’s policy framework ‘Dialogue and Dissent’. Please supply a maximum of 5 keywords.

Detailed description of the project proposal

Provide a detailed description of the proposed research in no more than 2000 words.

Please consult and take into consideration the assessment criteria against which the scientific quality and relevance of the proposal will be assessed (section 4.2.)

The narrative outline of the project should include the following aspects:

Research objectives.

Provide a brief analysis of the main research objectives, including the projects relation to the research foci mentioned in section 2.1. Elaborate on the assumptions of the Theory of Change of ‘Dialogue and Dissent’ the research aims to scrutinise.

Research questions and methodology.

Describe and justify the research questions and methodology. Describe how these questions and methodology have been developed from the research objectives of your project and explain their relevance. Please note that your research must not be evaluation research and must use qualitative research methods.

A description of the literature review.

Relate your research to existing insights from diverse scientific traditions. Identify some of the key publications and demonstrate the new and innovative contribution your project will make. The literature review may address both peer-reviewed scientific publications and grey literature.

A description of the empirical project

Describe the empirical project and its relation to the framework ‘Dialogue and Dissent’ of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Demonstrate clearly its link to projects/programmes implemented in LLMICs by CSOs supported by the MFA in the context of ‘Dialogue and Dissent’. Please explain also how your project extends beyond this framework. Note that it is obligatory to include actors, projects and/or cases which have no relation to this framework.

Knowledge Utilization and Sharing

Describe in no more than 750 words the expected outcome and impact of the project, related to the framework ‘Dialogue and Dissent’ of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Explain the type of evidence-based knowledge the project will provide on the assumption of the Theory of Change of the Dialogue and Dissent framework. Elaborate on its relevance for policymakers and CSOs in the Netherlands and LLMICs. Share your plans for making this knowledge accessible, available and applicable for the MFA and other parties, including the obligatory project kick-off and final- assessment workshop.

Timeline

A timeline of the project and its expected outcome in terms of knowledge utilization and sharing. Please take into account that the project may not last longer than 18 months, with 3 months devoted to the literature review and 15 months to the empirical project. It is possible that certain knowledge outcomes will be reached after the end of the project.

Roles & contribution of the consortium partners

In no more than two pages A4, describe the role and contribution of the consortium partners. This part should consist of three sections:

1. A description of the specific relevance of each of the applicants and their employer (the consortium member organisation) in terms of experience, skills, know-how and expertise.

2. A list of a maximum of five key publications per consortium member. You may refer to scientific manuscripts, abstracts and reviews but also to publications that address non- scientific stakeholders such as policy or company briefs or reports, websites, et cetera. Please provide the following details in full: authors, year and title. Also make sure reviewers can track the publication (for example by providing the name of the journal or series in which the publication appeared, web-links, contact details, et cetera).

3. Brief CVs of the consortium members. It is recommended to tailor the CVs such as to clearly bring out the expertise and experience of relevance for the current project.

Literature references

Using 1 page A4 only, list relevant literature and include full bibliographical details, e.g. authors, title article, title book/journal, eds., year, page nrs.

Regeling
Call for research proposals on assumptions underlying Dialogue & Dissent
Soort
ZBO-regeling
Geldend vanaf
13-07-2017
BWB-id
BWBR0039772
Versie
2017-07-13_0

In de hele regeling · Officiële tekst op wetten.overheid.nl