wetzoeker

4.2 — Assessment criteria Call for research proposals on assumptions underlying Dialogue & Dissent

Assessment criteria

Main assessment criteria

All eligible applications will be evaluated according to two main criteria: scientific quality and relevance for development policy and programming in the context of the policy framework Dialogue and Dissent. Applications will be ranked based upon an equal weighing of the two criteria. In order to be eligible for funding, the project proposal should score at least as ‘good’ (see NWO qualification system) for each of the two criteria.

− Scientific quality:

○ Validity of the conceptual framework (coherence of the objectives, research questions and scientific methodology);

○ Originality;

○ Demonstrable quality of (relevant) expertise of the main- and co-applicants, research staff;

○ Complementarity of expertise in the consortium.

− Policy relevance:

○ The extent to which the project proposal addresses the assumptions of the ToC of the Dialogue and Dissent framework, and relate to the analyses and questions in annex 2;

○ Proven ability to translate research findings into policy messages/advices that can be useful for the MFA for improving the D&D policy framework; both for generating input for the MFA and its learning trajectory with CSOs involved in the D&D policy framework, and for generating input for the design of its subsequent Civil Society policy framework

○ Feasibility of the work plan.

Regeling
Call for research proposals on assumptions underlying Dialogue & Dissent
Soort
ZBO-regeling
Geldend vanaf
13-07-2017
BWB-id
BWBR0039772
Versie
2017-07-13_0

In de hele regeling · Officiële tekst op wetten.overheid.nl